Clear scope
What is covered, what is not covered and how each type of incident is handled.
Not all maintenance contracts cover the same things. What matters is understanding scope, response times, prevention, security and the actual support model.
The difference between a useful contract and a weak one is usually in the less visible conditions: prevention, monitoring, security, documentation and escalation procedures.
What is covered, what is not covered and how each type of incident is handled.
Not just firefighting: monitoring, reviews and preventive maintenance included.
Response commitments, severity levels and escalation procedures defined in writing.
Users, Microsoft 365, networks, backups, endpoints and critical components properly addressed.
Remote support, on-site support, administration, monitoring, backup and cybersecurity where applicable.
What falls outside the contract and what is billed separately — to avoid surprises.
Committed response windows, working hours, severity levels and contact methods.
Reports, asset inventory, documentation and periodic environment reviews.
There are very cheap contracts that only serve to react too late. If the IT environment is important to the business, the contract should reduce outages, internal dependency and avoidable risks.
No. A contract usually implies a broader recurring scope, with ongoing oversight and greater predictability.
If the goal is to reduce incidents and outages, it should include at least a preventive layer — not just reactive fault-fixing.
Yes, because many real differences between providers appear precisely in what is not covered.
If you already have a current provider, we can also help you compare scope and identify gaps.
Leave your phone number and we will contact you within 1 hour.
By submitting you accept our privacy policy.